July 24th, 2024, 12:50 pm
July 24th, 2024, 1:57 pm
David McGown wrote:Steve,
The reason she re-released those albums were because she did not own the rights to them and had limited control over the artistic quality, reuse and distribution. Every artist should have the creative say over their art, and have the right to decide whether it is suitable for release, to profit off the royalties, and to license and approve the use of their art. This is called copyright. If she is making a bundle of money, then good for her and her good business sense.
It is no different than someone having a great and marketable idea, patent it, and then build a successful business producing or licensing the product, making a ton of money in the process. We idolize those people as brilliant entrepreneurs and business people.
David
July 24th, 2024, 11:37 pm
mix4fix wrote:...And, she is definitely not the person you want your daughters to be like. How many boyfriends she's had?...
SoundMods wrote:...This is the one time in my life that I have to agree with Steve. Taylor Swift and others like her are filthy rich "Divas" and although very talented their focus is strictly on their career -- PERIOD....
July 25th, 2024, 12:24 am
Jim G wrote:mix4fix wrote:...And, she is definitely not the person you want your daughters to be like. How many boyfriends she's had?...SoundMods wrote:...This is the one time in my life that I have to agree with Steve. Taylor Swift and others like her are filthy rich "Divas" and although very talented their focus is strictly on their career -- PERIOD....
Come on now fellas, what are you thinking? What man/men would you say those things about?
July 25th, 2024, 8:50 am
July 25th, 2024, 9:55 am
July 25th, 2024, 8:34 pm
Jim G wrote:So, you really DON'T see why those comments are offensive, do you? Everybody reading this thread should call it out.