tomp wrote:
. . . I still cannot envision a mechanism that would cause the LED to fail. A reverse voltage on the LED would cause a problem, but from the schematic I can't see how that would happen . . .
Galileo, when arguing with the Pope about the movement of the earth around the sun, famously said "and yet it moves". Paraphrasing that far more famous scientist, I say "and yet it fails". This isn't worth a long heated argument but it's interesting to think about potential mechanisms.
tomp wrote:
You also talk about the LED turn on time when in fact, the LED is always "on" in the forward direction.
I think you're missing the point. With any diode, one always has a "knee voltage" where the device suddenly start conducting and allows much more current to flow. This is how diodes work; they're non-linear devices that have a turn on voltage or knee voltage. This knee voltage is typically associated with the bandgap of the semiconductor material used in the fabrication of the diode. In a conventional silicon diode, that knee voltage is around 0.6v. Put 0.1v across a silicon diode and you'll get no current to flow. In an LED , the knee will be between 1.5v and 2.0v or higher, depending upon the color of the LED. What does it mean for a diode to be on when it allows negligible current through it?
In any case, the way an LED breaks down in the forward direction is to have too much current flowing through it, which equals too much power, which would be caused by too much voltage across it since the current is exponentially dependent upon the applied voltage. Since the LEDs are in fact breaking down, then the explanation must be related to too much applied voltage.
Hope this is interesting to people. I can stop at any time if this is boring or too argumentative.